Skip to main content

Written questions

Search written questions to Ministers and the replies they have received.

Filters
Asked by All MPs
Minister All Ministers
Portfolio All portfolios
Question published between

Dates refer to when the question was published, and are inclusive.

Showing 3001 to 3050 of 32204 written question sets.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What was the final audited value of the one-off accounting write-downs arising from the delivery pipeline review and land holdings review announced on 19 June 2025, which were estimated at that time at between $190 million and $220…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

I refer the Member to my response to parliamentary question 37955 (2026).

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 cancelled projects were located in Canterbury, where the register records that 33 of 48 assessed projects and 446 of 531 proposed homes were determined not to proceed, and what assessment, if any, was made of the effect…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that 33 projects were assessed as not proceeding in Canterbury. All 212 housing projects were not funded under the Public Housing Plan. Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that Kāinga…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 cancelled projects were located in Northland, where the register records that 40 of 46 assessed projects and 450 of 495 proposed homes were determined not to proceed, and what assessment, if any, was made of the effect…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that 40 projects were assessed as not proceeding in Northland. All 212 housing projects were not funded under the Public Housing Plan. Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that Kāinga…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What is the current status of each of the five largest cancelled projects by number of homes, being Jordan Avenue and Mount Smart Road, Onehunga (186 homes); Rowlands Avenue and Waipuna Road, Mount Wellington (180 homes); Elm Street and…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How much has Kāinga Ora incurred in holding costs on the sites of those 212 cancelled projects since 19 June 2025, if any, including rates, insurance, security, fencing, vegetation control and vandalism repair, and what is the total by…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many homes were demolished on the sites of those 212 cancelled projects prior to the decision not to proceed, if any, broken down by region?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

I refer the Member to the reply to written question 32141 (2025).

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 cancelled projects had resource consent granted at the point the decision not to proceed was made, if any, and how many of those consents have since lapsed or been surrendered?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 3,479 homes that the 212 cancelled projects would have delivered have since been consented or constructed on those same sites by any party, including Kāinga Ora, community housing providers, iwi or private developers, if…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that they do not hold this information.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 "not proceeding" projects have been re-scoped or re-designed at a smaller or different scale and subsequently re-entered the pipeline, if any, and how many homes would each now deliver?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 "not proceeding" sites have been retained by Kāinga Ora and remain vacant or undeveloped as at the latest date for which figures are available?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the sites associated with those 212 projects are currently listed for sale, if any, and what is the total land area involved?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the sites associated with the 212 projects have been sold as at the latest date for which figures are available, if any, and what were the gross proceeds from those sales?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 212 social housing projects listed as "Not proceeding" in the Pipeline Assessment register of 19 June 2025 have since been reinstated to the delivery pipeline, if any, and what is the address, region and number of homes for…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the projects assessed as "Proceeding" are currently forecast to exceed their approved budget, if any, and what is the aggregate value of the forecast overrun?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What was the estimated total capital cost of the projects assessed as "Proceeding" at the time of the June 2025 review, and what is the current forecast total capital cost of those same projects as at the latest date for which figures are…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Why does the Pipeline Assessment register published on 19 June 2025 record 253 projects with an assessment result of "Proceeding" when the accompanying media statement of the same date stated that 254 projects were going ahead, and which…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that the difference of one project was the Arlington development. As stated by Kāinga Ora at the time, the Arlington development was still under review but has since been announced as…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 79 projects recorded in the register as having an expected delivery of FY27 are currently assessed by Kāinga Ora as on track to be delivered by 30 June 2027, and how many, if any, are not?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the FY26 projects that were not completed by 30 June 2026 have had their expected delivery date revised, if any, and what is the revised expected delivery date for each?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the projects assessed as "Proceeding" in the June 2025 pipeline review have been physically completed as at the latest date for which figures are available, and how many homes have been delivered by those completed projects?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 175 projects recorded in the register as having an expected delivery of FY26 were completed by 30 June 2026, and how many, if any, were not?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Questions published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Questions

  • 37979

    When will Kāinga Ora publish an updated version of the Pipeline Assessment register released on 19 June 2025 showing the current assessment result for each project, if at all?

  • 37980

    How many social housing projects have been cancelled or stopped in each of Auckland, Wellington, Canterbury, Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Northland, Central North Island, East Coast, Southern, Taranaki and West Coast Tasman since 19 June 2025,…

  • 37983

    How much has been written down in respect of each social housing project cancelled since 19 June 2025, if any, and what is the total value of those write-downs?

  • 37985

    How many of the 175 projects recorded in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register with an expected delivery of FY26 have been cancelled rather than completed, if any, and what is the address and number of homes for each?

Show the remaining 7 questions
  • 37986

    What is the cumulative total number of social housing projects that Kāinga Ora has determined will not proceed since 19 June 2025, counting both the 212 projects recorded as "Not proceeding" in the Pipeline Assessment register and any…

  • 37988

    How many social housing projects have been paused, deferred, placed on hold or had their delivery date pushed beyond FY27 rather than formally cancelled since 19 June 2025, if any, and what is the address, region, number of homes and…

  • 37989

    How many social housing projects that were not listed in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register, having entered the delivery pipeline after that date, have since been cancelled or stopped, if any, and what is the address, region and…

  • 37990

    When was the decision made to cancel each social housing project that was recorded as "Proceeding" in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register but has since been cancelled, if any, and was each decision made by the Kāinga Ora Board,…

  • 37991

    What is the reason for the cancellation of each social housing project that was recorded as "Proceeding" in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register but has since been cancelled, if any, listed by project address?

  • 37992

    How many homes in total would the projects cancelled since 19 June 2025 have delivered, if any, and how does that figure compare to the 3,479 homes represented by the 212 projects already recorded as "Not proceeding" in the register…

  • 37993

    How many of the projects recorded with an assessment result of "Proceeding" in the Kāinga Ora Pipeline Assessment register published on 19 June 2025 have since been cancelled, stopped or removed from the delivery pipeline, if any, and what…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities advises me that the full pipeline review completed in June 2025 was a bespoke, one-off review. Accordingly, it does not intend to publish an updated version of the pipeline assessment register showing…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What is the current status of the site of each social housing project cancelled since 19 June 2025, if any, specifying for each whether the site is retained and vacant, listed for sale, sold, or has been returned to the pipeline in a…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the social housing projects cancelled since 19 June 2025 had resource consent granted, building consent granted, a construction contract signed, or physical construction under way at the point of cancellation, if any, and which…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many of the 79 projects recorded in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register with an expected delivery of FY27 have been cancelled, if any, and what is the address and number of homes for each?

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Kieran McAnulty

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many social housing projects that were recorded as "Proceeding" in the 19 June 2025 Pipeline Assessment register have had their number of homes reduced since that date, if any, and what is the address of each together with the number…

Answered by

Hon Chris Bishop

Member for Hutt South · National Party · Minister of Housing

Answer

To provide the information requested would take substantial effort and collation. In accordance with SR 210/6 I consider that the time, and hence the expense, of answering this question cannot be justified in this case.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following reply 36510 (2026), what evidence—if any—has the Minister considered to inform his position that "Programmes like Managed Aquifer Recharge are worth supporting and should be allowed to proceed"?

Answered by

Hon James Meager

Member for Rangitata · National Party · Minister for the South Island

Answer

https://www.ecan.govt.nz/get-involved/news-and-events/2026/court-rules-managed-aquifer-recharge-can-go-ahead-in-mid-canterbury

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Further to Reply 36371, how many mining access arrangements or concessions for mining on conservation land have been processed by the Department of Conservation and either approved or decline under delegated authority, and how does this…

Answered by

Hon Tama Potaka

Member for Hamilton West · National Party · Minister of Conservation

Answer

I am advised that from 1 September 2021 to 1 September 2026, the Department of Conservation approved 58 mining access arrangements and declined two under delegated authority. In the previous comparative five-year period, from 1 September…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following 36359 (2026), does the Minister acknowledge the estimate from the Environment Southland "Nitrogen Contamination in Southland Groundwater"—that 65 people across Southland may be served by a drinking water supply exceeding the 11.3…

Answered by

Hon James Meager

Member for Rangitata · National Party · Minister for the South Island

Answer

Yes. I expect the drinking water across the South Island (which includes Southland) to be below the safe drinking level of 11.3 mg/L.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following Reply 36523 (2026), does the Minister consider the statements of James Meager MP regarding media coverage of nitrate contamination in the Laghmor School drinking water supply were "balanced and evidence-based"?

Answered by

Hon Nicola Grigg

Member for Selwyn · National Party · Minister for the Environment

Answer

As I noted in my response, I support a balanced and evidence-based discussion of environmental issues. I have nothing further to add regarding comments made by another Member.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following Reply 36523 (2026), does the Minister consider that something about the media coverage of Laghmor School's drinking water supply breaching the nitrate drinking water limit "unfairly vilified" farmers?

Answered by

Hon Nicola Grigg

Member for Selwyn · National Party · Minister for the Environment

Answer

My response was not a comment on any specific media coverage. I believe environmental issues should be discussed in a balanced and evidence-based way, while recognising the efforts many farmers have made to improve environmental outcomes.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following reply 36524 (2026), how will "clearer environmental limits" contribute to the reduction of nitrate pollution over time as expected by the Minister?

Answered by

Hon Nicola Grigg

Member for Selwyn · National Party · Minister for the Environment

Answer

The Natural Environment Bill requires environmental limits to be set, and councils to avoid breaching those limits. In cases of a limit being breached, councils must create an action plan that includes how they will bring resource use back…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Did the Minister declare any pecuniary conflicts of interest in relation to cabinet decisions taken over targeted action to Plan Change 2 in the Manawatū-Whanganui?

Answered by

Hon Andrew Hoggard

List MP · ACT Party · Associate Minister for the Environment

Answer

I am confident that I have acted in accordance with the Cabinet Manual guidance in relation to this matter. Disclosures of information relating to Ministerial conflicts of interest are inherently confidential and not disclosed. This has…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Following reply 37170 (2026), was the letter regarding the "LGNZ response to use of climate change assumptions letter to councils" discussed at the subsequent meeting with Local Government New Zealand?

Answered by

Hon Simon Watts

Member for North Shore · National Party · Minister of Local Government

Answer

No

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Would the Prime Minister expect his Ministers to recuse themselves or declare a conflict of interest if they were to personally or commercially benefit from a decision made at cabinet?

Answered by

Rt Hon Christopher Luxon

Member for Botany · National Party · Prime Minister

Answer

I expect all Ministers to manage their interests in accordance with Cabinet Manual guidance.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lan Pham

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • Did any Ministers recuse themselves from cabinet consideration or declare a conflict or interest in relation to decisions taken over amendment papers to the Natural Environment Bill and Planning Bill?

Answered by

Rt Hon Christopher Luxon

Member for Botany · National Party · Prime Minister

Answer

Disclosures of information relating to Ministerial conflicts of interest are inherently confidential and not generally disclosed. This has been the approach of successive administrations, and I do not intend to depart from it. In order to…

Questions published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lawrence Xu-Nan

List MP · Green Party

Questions

  • 38004

    In response to Reply 35156 (2026), was the effective access of trial accounts to live production data tested prior to the Authority to Operate being issued on 20 March 2026?

  • 38006

    In response to Reply 35156 (2026), were trial accounts included in any access control testing used before the Authority to Operate was issued on 20 March 2026?

Answered by

Hon Erica Stanford

Member for East Coast Bays · National Party · Minister of Education

Answer

I am advised by the Ministry of Education that, prior to the Authority to Operate being issued on 20 March 2026, trial accounts were not included in the access control testing. This is also my response to written parliamentary question…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Ricardo Menéndez March

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • What are the accreditation periods, if any, available under the new graduated accreditation system announced for the Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) Scheme; listed by accreditation level?

Answered by

Hon Erica Stanford

Member for East Coast Bays · National Party · Minister of Immigration

Answer

Under the graduated accreditation, three different accreditation periods will be available. This change will not come into effect until the second half of 2027, with further work underway to finalise what measures the accreditation model…

Questions published
See individual question dates
Reply lodged

Asked by

Ingrid Leary

Member for Taieri · Labour Party

Questions

  • 37810

    Question published

    What research, analysis, reports, briefings, aide-mémoires, emails or other written advice, if any, did the Minister receive regarding the development or adoption of the revised Better Later Life indicator framework, listed by title and…

  • 37811

    Question published

    How will the revised Better Later Life indicator framework measure whether housing is affordable for people aged 65 and over, if at all?

  • 37812

    Question published

    What advice, if any, did the Ministry of Social Development provide on the revised Better Later Life indicator framework, including the selection, retention or removal of indicators, and on what dates was any such advice provided?

  • 37813

    Question published

    Why has the revised Better Later Life indicator framework adopted the percentage of people aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the housing options available to them as its key indicator under "creating diverse housing choices and…

Show the remaining 14 questions
  • 37814

    Question published

    What advice, if any, did the Minister receive about removing housing affordability from the key indicators reported under the revised Better Later Life indicator framework, and on what dates was any such advice received?

  • 37815

    Question published

    Why will housing affordability no longer be reported as a key indicator under the revised Better Later Life indicator framework from 2027?

  • 37816

    Question published

    What measure, if any, in the revised Better Later Life indicator framework will directly measure material hardship among people aged 65 and over?

  • 37817

    Question published

    What measure, if any, in the revised Better Later Life indicator framework will directly measure income adequacy among people aged 65 and over?

  • 37818

    Question published

    Does the Minister consider that the two revised key indicators, under Achieving financial security and economic participation, the percentage of people aged 45–64 contributing to KiwiSaver and the percentage of employed people aged 65 and…

  • 37819

    Question published

    Why will low income after housing costs no longer be reported as a key indicator under the revised Better Later Life indicator framework from 2027?

  • 37820

    Question published

    What advice, if any, did the Minister receive about removing low income after housing costs and material hardship from the key indicators reported under the revised Better Later Life indicator framework, and on what dates was any such…

  • 37821

    Question published

    Which indicators in the original Better Later Life indicator framework will no longer be reported as key indicators under the revised framework from 2027, listed by indicator?

  • 37822

    Question published

    What specific changes in available data, referred to on the Office for Seniors website, if any, contributed to the decision to replace the original Better Later Life indicator framework with a smaller set of key indicators from 2027?

  • 37823

    Question published

    What consultation, if any, was undertaken with older people, seniors’ organisations, academics, researchers, advocates, or other stakeholders on the revised Better Later Life indicator framework, and which organisations or individuals were…

  • 37824

    Question published

    Did the Minister approve or endorse the revised Better Later Life indicator framework to be reported against from 2027; if so, on what date?

  • 37825

    Question published

    Who made the decision to replace the original Better Later Life indicator framework of around 60 indicators with the revised framework to be reported against from 2027, and on what date was that decision made?

  • 37826

    Question published

    What advice, if any, did the Minister receive regarding the decision to replace the original Better Later Life indicator framework of around 60 indicators with a smaller set of key indicators from 2027, and on what dates was any such…

  • 37861

    Question published

    What consideration, if any, was given to retaining an indicator of the proportion of income people aged 65 and over-spend on housing costs in the revised Better Later Life indicator framework?

Answered by

Hon Casey Costello

List MP · NZ First Party · Minister for Seniors

Answer

Titles of advice that I receive are proactively released on the Office for Seniors website (https://officeforseniors.govt.nz/our-work/proactive-releases/reports-to-the-minister-for-seniors/). In considering how best to monitor outcomes…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lawrence Xu-Nan

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • In response to Reply 35162 (2026), what evidence, if any, is there which establishes trial login access to live reporting records occurring on 3 July 2026, or is 3 July 2026 merely the earliest date in which unauthorised access to live…

Answered by

Hon Erica Stanford

Member for East Coast Bays · National Party · Minister of Education

Answer

I am advised by the Ministry of Education that the reporting subsystem was not available for access by the sector prior to 3 July 2026. This was confirmed during the review in response to the data incident.

Questions published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lawrence Xu-Nan

List MP · Green Party

Questions

  • 37848

    In response to Reply 35156 (2026), did the SMART Certification and Accreditation process include testing to determine whether trial accounts could access live production reporting data; if not, why not?

  • 37851

    In response to Reply 35160 (2026), did the Student Monitoring, Assessment and Reporting Tool (SMART) Certification and Accreditation process include authorisation or access-control testing to determine whether trial accounts could access…

Answered by

Hon Erica Stanford

Member for East Coast Bays · National Party · Minister of Education

Answer

No. I am advised by the Ministry of Education that the Certificate and Accreditation process did not specifically include testing of whether trial accounts could access live reporting data, including authorisation or access controls for…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Lawrence Xu-Nan

List MP · Green Party

Question

  • In response to Reply 35202 (2026), will Artificial Intelligence (AI) be used to design and/or write any of the nine new industry-led subjects?

Answered by

Hon Erica Stanford

Member for East Coast Bays · National Party · Minister of Education

Answer

The development of industry-led subjects will be led by Industry Skills Boards (ISBs) in line with the Ministry’s curriculum design criteria. While this does not explicitly reference the use of artificial intelligence (AI), AI may be used…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • What assessment has the Minister made of the potential effects of increased aluminium-extrusion imports on skills retention, workforce capability, investment, and productive capacity in New Zealand manufacturing, if any?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

Under the Trade (Safeguard Measures) Act 2014, MBIE carries out the investigation and provides me with advice. I cannot comment on the investigation underway.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • What further information, if any, has the Minister requested in relation to a possible provisional safeguard duty for aluminium extrusions, and on what dates was it requested?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

Under the Trade (Safeguard Measures) Act 2014, MBIE carries out the investigation and provides me with information and advice to support my decision. The Aluminium Extruders Association of New Zealand (ALENZ) requested consideration of a…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • How many MBIE officials or managers have held responsibility for the aluminium-extrusions safeguard investigation since the application was received, if any?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

Since the aluminium extrusions safeguard investigation application was received, responsibility for trade remedies has been held by three General Managers, and two managers reporting to them. Day-to-day management of the Trade Remedies…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • What advice, if any, has the Minister received on the application of section 14 of the Trade (Safeguard Measures) Act 2014 to the aluminium-extrusions safeguard investigation?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

I received advice on a possible provisional safeguard duty from MBIE on 4 August and 1 September 2026. Following advice from MBIE, I have decided not to impose provisional safeguard duties at this stage. This position relates only to…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • Has the Minister received a recommendation from the chief executive of MBIE on a provisional safeguard duty in respect of aluminium extrusions; if so, on what date was it received?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

Yes, on 4 August 2026 and 1 September 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • When does the Minister expect to decide whether to impose a provisional safeguard duty in respect of aluminium extrusions?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

Following advice from MBIE, I have decided not to impose provisional safeguard duties at this stage. This position relates only to ALENZ’s request for provisional duties and does not prejudge the outcome of the wider safeguard…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • Has the Minister or any representative of the Minister met with workers, unions, employers, or industry representatives affected by the aluminium-extrusions safeguard investigation; if so, on what dates and with whom?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

The investigation is being carried out by MBIE officials, and they meet regularly with interested parties as part of the investigation.

Questions published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Questions

  • 37858

    What information has the Minister or his office received on the change in the volume of aluminium-extrusion imports during the most recent six-month period compared with the corresponding six-month period a year earlier, if any?

  • 37859

    What information has the Minister received on the volume of aluminium-extrusion imports entering New Zealand between the receipt of the safeguard application and the initiation of the investigation, if any?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

I cannot comment on the investigation underway. However, I expect that more information will be made available in due course.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Megan Woods

Member for Wigram · Labour Party

Question

  • How many calendar days elapsed between the receipt of the aluminium-extrusions safeguard application and the initiation of the associated safeguard investigation, if any?

Answered by

Cameron Brewer

Member for Upper Harbour · National Party · Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Answer

MBIE received the application for a safeguard investigation into aluminium extrusions on 21 January 2026. Following MBIE’s assessment of the application, I was provided with advice on 14 May recommending a safeguard investigation be…