Skip to main content

Written questions

Search written questions to Ministers and the replies they have received.

Filters
Asked by All MPs
Minister All Ministers
Portfolio All portfolios
Question published between

Dates refer to when the question was published, and are inclusive.

Showing 5151 to 5200 of 32204 written question sets.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Has New Zealand’s Ambassador to the People’s Republic of China been summoned, called in, or otherwise asked to attend a meeting by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China in connection with remarks made in the New…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What standing instruction or practice, if any, governs whether and when the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade advises the Office of the Prime Minister that a foreign mission has lodged formal representations concerning the conduct or…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

MFAT seconds New Zealand diplomats into various roles in Parliament, including the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, and the Offices of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister for Trade and Investment, and the Minister of…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Were any Ministers other than himself notified that the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand had lodged representations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade on 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament; if so,…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The Chinese Government itself put out a public statement about these representations on 30 July 2026, and my office also put out a statement about it. It was therefore not necessary to form a judgment about whether other Ministers should…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Was the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet notified that the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand had lodged representations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade on 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The senior MFAT secondees in DPMC and MFAT discussed this matter on 30 July 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Was the Office of the Prime Minister notified that the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand had lodged representations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade on 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament; if so,…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The senior MFAT secondees in DPMC and MFAT discussed this matter on 30 July 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Has he issued any instruction to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade regarding how it should respond to the representations lodged by the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand on 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No. My office, when notified by phone call that MFAT expected to received phone calls from the Chinese Government in Wellington and Beijing, instructed MFAT to be in “listening mode” – i.e. to note down what was said, report it back to my…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Was he consulted on, or did he approve, the content of any New Zealand response to the representations lodged by the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand on 30 July 2026 before that response was conveyed?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No. My office, when notified by phone call that MFAT expected to received phone calls from the Chinese Government in Wellington and Beijing, instructed MFAT to be in “listening mode” – i.e. to note down what was said, report it back to my…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Has the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade conveyed any response to the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand concerning the representations that Embassy lodged on 30 July 2026 over remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament; if so, on what…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No. My office, when notified by phone call that MFAT expected to received phone calls from the Chinese Government in Wellington and Beijing, instructed MFAT to be in “listening mode” – i.e. to note down what was said, report it back to my…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Has any New Zealand official been asked to attend the Chinese Embassy in Wellington in connection with remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament on 29 July 2026, at any time since that date; if so, on what date and at what level of…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Was any document handed to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade by the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand in the course of the representations of 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament; if so, what was the…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What written records, if any, does the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade hold of the representations lodged by the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand on 30 July 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament, including any note…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

A short email reporting on the meeting was written by the Unit Manager of the North Asia Division on 30 July.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Did the meeting or conversation of 30 July 2026 between an official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament take place in person, by…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

By telephone.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • At what level of seniority, on each side, was the meeting or conversation of 30 July 2026 between an official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand concerning remarks made in the New Zealand…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The Unit Manager of North Asia Division of MFAT and the Acting Deputy Head of Mission of the Chinese Embassy.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Was the meeting or conversation on 30 July 2026 between an official of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand, at which that Embassy states it lodged solemn representations concerning remarks made…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The Embassy.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How is the approach made by the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade on 30 July 2026, described by that Embassy as the lodging of “solemn representations” over negative China-related remarks made in…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

MFAT does not hold a central registry of all its engagements with foreign governments which are classified in this way. The approach was referred to by officials as a phone call.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he stand by his statement in the House on 5 August 2026, in answer to a supplementary question to oral question No. 6, that a member of Parliament “has been in this Parliament five minutes, has wasted so much of Parliament’s time”?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Yes.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many separate approaches, if any, did the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade receive from the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand between 29 July 2026 and 5 August 2026 concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament, and on what…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

There was one conversation between MFAT and the Chinese Embassy on this matter, on 30 July 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • On what date and at what time was he first informed that the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand had lodged representations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade concerning remarks made in the New Zealand Parliament on 29 July 2026,…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

On 30 July 2026 by the senior MFAT secondee in my office.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he stand by his statement to media at Parliament on 29 July 2026, referring to a member of Parliament who had heckled him during the general debate that day, that the member “can’t even speak the language properly”?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The comment you refer to was made as Leader of New Zealand First and not the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he consider that statements made publicly by a Minister of Foreign Affairs about another country are capable of being understood by the government of that country as reflecting the position of the New Zealand Government, irrespective…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

In my experience, foreign governments are quite capable of distinguishing between statements of foreign policy and domestic political debates.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Has he, in his capacity as Minister of Foreign Affairs, corrected, clarified, withdrawn, or qualified any part of the words he spoke in the general debate in the House on 29 July 2026 in which he told a member of Parliament to “go back to…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No, the comments made were as Leader of New Zealand First.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he stand by his statement in the House on 5 August 2026, in response to a supplementary question asking whether he agreed that Chinese people “lie like a flat fish”, that “That statement is demonstrably, on the Hansard, false.”; if…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Yes, In the relevant series of supplementary questions, the comments made in the general debate were not accurately quoted – as ruled by the Speaker.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he consider that the words “that’s where they lie like a flatfish”, spoken by him in the general debate in the House on 29 July 2026, referred to the People’s Republic of China, to the Government of the People’s Republic of China, to…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The comments the member refers to were made as the Leader of New Zealand First and not as the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • To whom or what does the word “they” refer in the words “that’s where they lie like a flatfish”, spoken by him and recorded in Hansard for the general debate in the House on 29 July 2026, given his statement in the House on 5 August 2026…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The comments the member refers to were made as the Leader of New Zealand First and not as the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he stand by his statement in the House on 5 August 2026, in answer to oral question No. 6, that he stands by all his statements as Minister of Foreign Affairs “including those made during two visits this term to China”?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Yes.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Does he stand by his statement in the House on 5 August 2026, in answer to oral question No. 6 asking whether he stood by all his statements and actions, “I stand by all my comments as the Minister of Foreign Affairs. I also stand by my…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Yes.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33624 (2026), will the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade now undertake an assessment of the implications of the abstention for New Zealand's international human rights reputation and for current or prospective New…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No. An assessment is not needed.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33619 (2026), what consultation, if any, did New Zealand have with Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, or European Union member states about the reappointment resolution before the vote?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade engages regularly with partners on a range of issues. This issue was no exception.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33603 (2026), did New Zealand raise its process concerns about the reappointment with the Office of the Secretary-General, the President of the General Assembly, or any other member state before 24 July 2026, and if not,…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No, because they only emerged during the debate.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33609 (2026), does the Government hold any record, including any cable, email, file note, or telephone log, of the decision to abstain, and will those records be released?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade holds some records about this decision, which can be requested under the OIA.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33609 (2026), given that the vote occurred on 24 July 2026 in New York, is the decision date of Saturday 25 July 2026 (NZT) the same decision expressed in New Zealand time, or a separate decision taken after the vote was…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The same decision expressed in New Zealand time.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33616 (2026), how is the statement that "the Ministry did not provide advice to the Minister on the vote" to be reconciled with reply 33604 (2026), which records that voting instructions on the resolution were issued by…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Voting instructions do not consitute advice to me.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33618 (2026), what explanation, if any, was given to other delegations, whether bilaterally or in any group setting, for New Zealand's abstention, and on what dates?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Officials had a range of discussions, on a range of dates, with partners on New Zealand’s abstention, which informed them that New Zealand’s abstention related to process and was not a reflection on the merits of the candidate.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33618 (2026), did New Zealand's representative make any oral remarks, general statement, or other in-chamber intervention in connection with the abstention on 24 July 2026?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33608 (2026), has the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade reviewed its handling of this vote, and will any changes be made to its instruction-setting, delegation, or escalation practices as a result?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

No. The Ministry regularly reviews its approach to consider whether improvements or changes in processes are needed. In this instance, no changes appear to be necessary. It is accepted, however, that in ideal circumstances, the information…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), what attempts, if any, were made to contact Wellington before the vote was taken, at what times, and to which officials?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Officials posted to the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations spoke with officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade immediately before the vote (on the morning of Saturday 25 August NZT).

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), under what delegated authority may a New Zealand representative depart from voting instructions issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

New Zealand representatives to any multilateral body cast votes as instructed. If facts which may have been material to a decision on how to vote on a particular resolution emerge after the issuing of voting instructions, then the New…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), which official took the decision to abstain in New York, and was that official the Permanent Representative, the Deputy Permanent Representative, or another officer of the Permanent Mission?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The decision to abstain was taken by MFAT officials in Wellington in discussion with officials at the Permanent Mission in New York.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33603 (2026), given that the Secretary-General's nomination of Mr Türk and the timing of the Secretary-General succession process were both matters of public record before 24 July 2026, why were the process concerns cited…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Issues emerged during the course of the debate.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), was the additional information referred to related to the process concerns described in reply 33603 (2026), namely that the reappointment was for an unprecedented second four-year term and that it occurred…

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

There were a range of factors.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), did the additional information cause New Zealand's representative to depart from an instruction to vote in favour, or from an instruction to vote against?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

The decision to abstain was taken by MFAT officials in Wellington in discussion with officials at the Permanent Mission in New York.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), what considerations informed the voting instructions as originally issued?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

A range of considerations informed the voting.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), were the original voting instructions recorded in writing, and will the Minister release them?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Voting instructions were conveyed in writing by MFAT to the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations. They can be requested under the Official Information Act.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), what specifically was the "additional information" that emerged once debate of the relevant resolution was underway and which had not been apparent at the time voting instructions were issued?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

A range of information emerged during the debate which was deemed material to the voting instructions.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Vanushi Walters

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to reply 33604 (2026), which official or officials issued the voting instructions, and at what level of seniority?

Answered by

Rt Hon Winston Peters

List MP · NZ First · Minister of Foreign Affairs

Answer

Voting instructions are issued by the Ministry as an institution and are signed out at management level.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Georgie Dansey

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many people received hardship assistance payments for emergency housing in Hamilton City during the June 2026 quarter; and how many received hardship assistance payments for emergency housing during the June 2023 quarter?

Answered by

Hon Tama Potaka

Member for Hamilton West · National Party · Associate Minister of Housing

Answer

I am advised that the Ministry of Social Development publishes this information on their website. I refer the Member to the following links: • Emergency Housing Grants - TLA - June 2026:…

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Georgie Dansey

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many people received hardship assistance payments for food in Hamilton City during the June 2026 quarter; and how many received hardship assistance payments for food during the June 2023 quarter?

Answered by

Hon Louise Upston

Member for Taupō · National Party · Minister for Social Development and Employment

Answer

I refer the member to the attached table, which provides the number of grants and clients who received a Special Needs Grant for food in Hamilton City during the quarters June 2023 and June 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Georgie Dansey

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many people received hardship assistance payments in Hamilton City during the June 2026 quarter; and how many received hardship assistance payments during the December 2023 quarter?

Answered by

Hon Louise Upston

Member for Taupō · National Party · Minister for Social Development and Employment

Answer

I refer the member to the attached table, which provides the number of grants and clients who received a hardship grant in Hamilton City during the quarters December 2023 and June 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Georgie Dansey

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many people receiving Jobseeker Support were sanctioned in Hamilton City during the June 2026 quarter; and how many were sanctioned in the June 2023 quarter?

Answered by

Hon Louise Upston

Member for Taupō · National Party · Minister for Social Development and Employment

Answer

I refer the member to the attached table, which provides the number of sanctions imposed on working age Jobseeker Support clients in Hamilton City Territorial Local Authority in quarter ending June 2023 and June 2026.

Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Georgie Dansey

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • How many people who identify as Māori are currently unemployed in Hamilton City; and how many were there in November 2023?

Answered by

Hon Louise Upston

Member for Taupō · National Party · Minister for Social Development and Employment

Answer

I am advised that the time, hence the expense, required to answer this question within the timeframe for written parliamentary questions is not in the public interest, in accordance with Speaker's Ruling 210/6, as specific Hamilton City…