Skip to main content

What proportion, if any, of New Zealand’s World Health Organization contributions in each of the last five years were discretionary or earmarked funding, and what programmes or regions were they allocated to?

Answered Question 4931 (2026)
Question published
Reply lodged

Asked by

Ayesha Verrall

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • What proportion, if any, of New Zealand’s World Health Organization contributions in each of the last five years were discretionary or earmarked funding, and what programmes or regions were they allocated to?

Answered by

Hon Simeon Brown

Member for Pakuranga · National Party · Minister of Health

Answer

I am advised that New Zealand’s assessed contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO) are not earmarked funds. They provide flexible funding that WHO can allocate across the programme budget that is approved by Member States. New Zealand’s assessed contributions to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control are not earmarked funds. They are mandatory dues paid by Parties under an agreed scale of assessment to fund the Convention Secretariat’s workplan and budget, rather than tagged to specific projects or countries. New Zealand’s payment to the WHO Radiation and Health Unit is an earmarked payment linked to the WHO International EMF Project.