Skip to main content

Further to the reply to written question 32029 (2026), which sub-pathway did the one application that exceeded statutory timeframes fall within, by how many working days was the timeframe exceeded, and what consequences, if any, followed from that breach?

Answered Question 36189 (2026)
Question published
Reply lodged
Bookmark

Asked by

Damien O'Connor

List MP · Labour Party

Question

  • Further to the reply to written question 32029 (2026), which sub-pathway did the one application that exceeded statutory timeframes fall within, by how many working days was the timeframe exceeded, and what consequences, if any, followed from that breach?

Answered by

Mike Butterick

Member for Wairarapa · National Party · Minister for Land Information

Answer

The application that exceeded its statutory timeframe was a farm land advertising exemption application. It exceeded its timeframe by 37 working days. There are no statutory consequences for exceeding the statutory timeframe for assessment.